Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: > On September 2, 2016 2:51:03 PM GMT+03:00, Ricardo Wurmus > <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> wrote: >> >>Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: >>>> >>>> > Kei Kebreau <k...@openmailbox.org> writes: >>>> > >>>> >> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Kei Kebreau <k...@openmailbox.org> writes: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Whoops, last patch was a bit messy and stacked on the previous >>one. This >>>> >>>> patch should be better! >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I just wanted to push a slightly modified version of this >>(attached) but >>>> >>> I cannot actually build the package. The patch to remove unused >>code >>>> >>> does not apply due to different line endings. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Could you please take a look at this again and make sure that >>the patch >>>> >>> to the sources applies? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> ~~ Ricardo >>>> >>> >>>> >> I just tried it on my machine, and everything applied and built >>>> >> correctly from a clean Guix tree. I don't exactly know how to >>proceed >>>> >> From here. Perhaps a third party can try to build from the patch? >>>> > >>>> > The problem might be with the inline patch in the email. Don’t >>know. >>>> > >>>> > ~~ Ricardo >>>> >>>> I'll try sending it again, for lack of a better plan. If all else >>fails >>>> I can post it on paste.lisp.org. >> >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 139 (different line endings). >>[...] >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 47 (different line endings). >> >>These are the exact same errors I got. Maybe the line endings were >>converted automatically when you saved the patch with your editor? >> >>~~ Ricardo > > I opened the mail with mutt, passed the patch to "cd workspace/guix; git am", > which is my normal workflow
Sorry, my reply was meant to be directed at Kei. ~~ Ricardo