On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:29:16PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:35:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Seems like most of the arguments and phases are shared with ‘openssl’, > >> right? What about using ‘substitute-keyword-arguments’ to reduce > >> duplication? Or are you concerned about potential breakage when one > >> series or the other changes? > > > > I've attached an updated patch using 'substitute-keyword-arguments'. > > > > BTW, my previous patch made a one-line change to 'move-man3-pages', > > deleting the leftover empty man3 directory in the main output after > > copying the manpages to the 'doc' output. Is this change desired? > > Sure. Perhaps you can commit this part to core-updates?
Done! > > From 83405a4ea3628cababd2ee5904c8d0628a002d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> > > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:07:29 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openssl-next. > > > > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl-next): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/patches/openssl-1.1.0-c-rehash-in.patch: New file. > > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > > LGTM, thank you! Pushed! Thanks for the review :)
