Pjotr Prins writes: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:44:48PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> Just a reply on the notabug question (I don't have much time otherwise): >> Notabug will eventually move to an instance of pagure.io, you can read >> about this in their own issues where I asked about some question back >> then (no link, sorry .. my name was 'ng0' back on there). Developing >> with pagure might be easier (fedora and surrounding communities) >> compared to the situation they describe in the issue. >> I started packaging pagure for this reason, which is about ~85% done >> (services + pagure itself left to wrap it up ... pagure itself is more >> or less done, just the service are needed. I'm more than happy to pass >> this on (could rebase the pagure patch), as I know I have taken on some >> tasks which would be better handled by different people :) >> That is in case you want to use a GuixSD as a host, otherwise you should >> not have many problems. > > That would be a great result :). Also pagure looks very interesting - > simpler than gitlab. I like simple.
It does look good: Open data: Sources, doc, ticket and pull-requests meta-data are available in the web interface but also in git repos which can thus be cloned and changed locally. That's really appealing.
