John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> writes: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > > Sure it is! > > What I meant is that Ratpoison is not the most "intuitive" WM for non > GNU Emacs/Screen users. As a consequence adding it in an example > configuration which is likely to be copy and paste, is maybe not the > most welcoming thing. :) > > IMHO Openbox or anything which is able to launch a program by "clicking" > seems more friendly as a default (modulo the accessibility issues which > to my knowledge are not addressed by any of the "lightweight" WMs). > ... > So most of them found "clicking" extremely unfriendly. Please be very > carefull when making generalisations like "GUIs are intuitive" "mice are > friendly" etc. As we said before - it depends uponn the user.
I don't think I have made this generalisation. :) I haven't said that "clicking is more friendly". I have precisely said "'clicking' seems more friendly as a default". "defaults" are not adapted to everybody, especially in the case of people who are computer illiterates. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
