ng0 transcribed 1.9K bytes: > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.2K bytes: > > Hello, > > > > tumashu <tuma...@163.com> skribis: > > > > > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split package easy > > > > Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split > > it, which may not be that simple. > > > > Ludo’. > > > > > noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends: > https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk > noto itself is offered on the website in many different > blends aswell: > https://www.google.com/get/noto/ > > By the way, this is totally unversioned. Is our only way > to know that noto has been updated by our package reporting > a hash missmatch? Looks to me like it is. > Should we store the fonts somewhere versioned as a fallback?
For noto-cjk debian has some notes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862276 -- ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature