Dave Love <f...@gnu.org> writes: > Another point about the OB package is that it excludes LAPACK for some > reason that doesn't seem to be recorded. I think that should be > included, partly for convenience, and partly because it optimizes some > of LAPACK.
That was me, I think. I did this because I assumed that if users want LAPACK they’d just install the lapack package. If this turns out to be a misguided idea because the OB LAPACK differs then I’m fine with enabling LAPACK in the OB package. (I’m not very knowlegdeable about all of this. I just happened to package OpenBLAS first.) -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net
