swedebugia transcribed 1.7K bytes: > Hi > > On May 13, 2018 2:27:22 AM GMT+02:00, Tonton <ton...@riseup.net> wrote: > >Hi, > > > ... > > should we make the CoC more prominent or > >somehow > >inform about it better? For example by putting it or a link to it in > >the topic > >of the IRC channel, as it's own page on the website, if possible as > >part of > >the welcome message to the mailing lists, others? > > Yes I think so. I like you proposals. I knew we had one and found it via the > manual. > > > > >A second question is, the contributor covenant has evolved, should we > >upgrade > >ours from 1.3.0 to the current > >[1.4.0](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct)? > > This community does not really have any maintainers or formal leadership to > my knowledge. > How to handle reporting in our case could be handled by here by vote > appointing a person to handle such issues (for example as a mediator like in > https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Conflict_Resolution)
Here's another group working on "Guidelines for Moderators of Coexistence". Their document is well-written and now translated in 3 languages: https://structure.pages.de/convivenza.en > >Would like to say that this is probably the best informatics community > >I've > >been part of and the reason I'm bringing it up is to make a statement > >that we > >care, and to make it easier for outsiders and potential participants to > >see > >that this is in fact part of our backbone. I'm so often positively > >surprised > >by the quality of communication here. > > I agree. Conflicts here seem rare and to my knowledge well handled when they > do. > > Cheers > Swedebugia
