Chris Marusich <cmmarus...@gmail.com> writes: >> A second question is, the contributor covenant has evolved, should we upgrade >> ours from 1.3.0 to the current >> [1.4.0](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct)? > > To help people understand what has changed going from 1.3.0 to 1.4, here > is a handy command you can use to get a visual diff of the versions: > > wdiff -n -w $'\033[30;41m' -x $'\033[0m' -y $'\033[30;42m' -z $'\033[0m' \ > <(curl > https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/code-of-conduct.txt) \ > <(curl > https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.txt) \ > | less -R
From my reading of the diff, these are the main changes: * Make the code more inclusive (e.g., change "sexual orientation" to "sexual identity and orientation"). * Clarify that the code applies not only to the "project" but also to the larger "community" surrounding it. * Add multiple "examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment," such as "gracefully accepting constructive criticism." * Explicitly state that "project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior". * Add "examples of representing a project or community", such as "using an official project e-mail address". * Explicitly title each section to clarify the document structure. * Instead of just the "maintainers", the "project team" as a whole is now also "obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident." These all seem like good improvements to me. I think we should upgrade to 1.4! -- Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature