Hi Pierre, On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:42:27 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
[...] > One thing I'd like to understand about Common Lisp packages in Guix, > if you can shed some light on this: the build system uses ASDF to > "bundle compile" the entire package into a > single /gnu/store/…-PACKAGE/lib/PACKAGE--system.fasl file. This file > is then referenced in /gnu/store…-PACKAGE/lib/PACKAGE.asd. So when a > Common Lisp package looks for its dependencies, it searches for a > PACKAGE.asd file in the LIBRARY_PATH environment variable. Is this > correct? It's actually using XDG_DATA_DIRS. In Guix, we set up our lisp implementations to check for share/{lisp}-bundle-systems for system definitions. The links there are followed to the lib directory which is a bit arbitrary, but was already being used for built-in libraries by sbcl. > > If so, what would be the steps to package a Common Lisp library > without ASDF? I guess you'd have to basically do what asdf does - call the compiler on the source files with all the right ceremony. > Is it possible to create a bundle without ASDF? I'm guessing it is but it's probably implementation specific. > How > are multiple .fasl files loaded when put in a folder pointed by > LIBRARY_PATH? Do we absolutely need a .asd file? > It could be done with output translations but it's super brittle in my experience. I think some asd file is required regardless. > I have skimmed over the ASDF documentation but I am not sure I can > find answers there. > > > The log listed in the report when using that PR doesn't show the > > full details - but I've just found out that some warnings are being > > treated as errors by sbcl. > > Which log? If it's one of mine, I can post the full backtrace. As > I'm not too familiar (yet) with Common Lisp and SBCL, I might have > missed important parts of the backtrace. Let me know. I was referring to the log you posted at [1]. I'm guessing that there's a warning somewhere just up above. > > Regarding your additions: Have a look at my wip-next-browser branch, > in case it's overlapping with your work. I've borrowed one or two of > the packages you had sent earlier on this list. I've also "fixed" > one thing in the build system (more of a quick & dirty workaround). Sure thing. > > Cheers! > -- Andy [1]<https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/457#details-issuecomment-415824038>