Kei Kebreau <kkebr...@posteo.net> skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hello, >> >> n...@n0.is skribis: >> >>> names for packages are (mostly) random, although in some >>> cases following classiifcations (see python-*, r-*, ...). >> >> That randomness is very limited in practice, if I may. :-) >> >> https://gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Package-Naming.html >> >> “qtoctave” was added by Kei. WDYT about the naming issue, Kei? >> >> Ludo’. > > I agree with ng0 that Octave and its GUI interface should be kept in > separate packages, as the difference in size is more than 5000 MiB. > I also agree that the GUI package should be named "octave", but I don't > know whether the CLI package should be named "octave-minimal" or > "octave-cli". I find myself leaning toward "octave-cli" because the CLI > package does include some non-essential dependencies.
Makes sense to me. If others agree with this (“octave-cli” rather than “octave-minimal”), go ahead! Ludo’.
