Hi! Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >>> I don't think we should release 1.0 until at least >>> <https://bugs.gnu.org/34454> and <https://bugs.gnu.org/34528> are >>> fixed. Trying a new distribution only to find your favourite programs >>> are crashing would be a _terrible_ first impression. >> >> Do we have any leads on this IceCat issue? I use IceCat daily and never >> have any problems of this sort, FWIW. > > I’ve seen something like this before, but *only* on i686 machines. I > never managed to figure out why. It looks like Mark fixed this in bc91562939ee002e84c95d13c907482b6d1e9339. \o/ > One of the GNOME update branches (for 2.28?) has already been merged > into staging. There are rumours of crashes, though, so this will > require testing by more people. OK, so I guess we should first focus on getting ‘staging’ tested and merged. x86_64 substitutes on ci.guix.info cover 60% of the packages right now. The main issue is that libdrm has one test failure (see <https://ci.guix.info/log/n3hrfx0yvz6g3xm0zkixahn227lispim-libdrm-2.4.97>): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- starting phase `check' [0/1] Running all tests. 1/16 kms-symbol-check OK 0.12 s 2/16 gen4-3d.batch OK 0.04 s 3/16 gen45-3d.batch OK 0.04 s 4/16 gen5-3d.batch OK 0.04 s 5/16 gen6-3d.batch OK 0.04 s 6/16 gen7-3d.batch OK 0.04 s 7/16 gen7-2d-copy.batch OK 0.02 s 8/16 intel-symbol-check OK 0.67 s 9/16 nouveau-symbol-check OK 0.32 s 10/16 radeon-symbol-check OK 0.37 s 11/16 amdgpu-symbol-check OK 0.52 s 12/16 threaded SKIP 0.01 s 13/16 random TIMEOUT 240.01 s 14/16 hash OK 0.02 s 15/16 drmsl OK 1.23 s 16/16 drmdevice SKIP 0.01 s Ok: 13 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 1 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 2 Timeout: 1 The output from the failed tests: 13/16 random TIMEOUT 240.01 s --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > The other GNOME upgrade that I worked on months ago still awaits a > rebase onto staging. I’ll try to get it into good shape to have the > build farm build it out, so that more people can test it and provide > fixes where needed. Perhaps we can first merge ‘staging’ in its current form, then make this branch the new ‘staging’ and aim for a merge as is (with only fixes committed there.) How does that sound? Ludo’.
