Hi, jerem...@pdp10.guru skribis:
> 3) not actually converge the code and simply throw one or both of them > away. Say write the whole thing in a better language than C (haskell > perhaps but ultimately requires abandoning previous work). I see a fourth option, which is to keep both. :-) In effect, it seems there are now two diverging projects. I think that’s fine: more bootstrapping work and more diversity is better! For Guix, the Scheme-based approach Janneke et al. have been pursing remains the most attractive. At any rate, work on Haskell will probably benefit Guix (and other distros I guess!) to have a fully built-from-source Haskell platform. Thanks for explaining, Ludo’.
