> I see a fourth option, which is to keep both. :-) Might want to fix up the confusing naming in that case
> In effect, it seems there are now two diverging projects. I think that’s > fine: more bootstrapping work and more diversity is better! Converging actually as they share the exact same goal of bootstrap from nothing and run MesCC > For Guix, the Scheme-based approach Janneke et al. have been pursing remains > the most attractive. And would be faster if MesCC running on guile was used as the lone bootstrap seed. > At any rate, work on Haskell will probably benefit Guix (and other distros I > guess!) to have a fully built-from-source Haskell platform. Indeed -Jeremiah
