On Mon Aug 1, 2022 at 10:43 PM +0200, Mája Tomášek wrote: > More realistic (imo) is that zig should be encouraged to build > dynamically linked packages, not static ones, and allow the ability > (with their future package manager) for the distribution to distribute > it's libraries C-style.
Technically this is not always possible since Zig relies on compile-time execution for generic. > If there's a newer version required, it should > be up to the distribution mantainers to fix that. Zig source files could be handled in the same manner as C headers however, and be used as native inputs, so downstream can still update a library for all dependees at once.