Hey,
Thanks for the update! > - armhf-linux is disabled on ci.guix due to improper offloading > setup (probably along the lines of > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53463>). Should we try and reenable > it, or should we drop it? > > - powerpc64le-linux is disabled on ci.guix since today > (maintenance.git commit > d641115e20973731555b586985fa81fbe293aeca). However it did work > until recently and we have one machine to offload to. Should we > fix it or drop it? Mathieu? Yeah, we only have a single machine to offload to and each time it is not reachable, the "guix" specification fails on Cuirass. That's because we need to offload to a powerpc64le-linux machine in order to evaluate the guix derivation for that specific architecture (that's true for all the other architectures). Given the lack of workers for powerpc64le-linux I think we should drop it. Regarding armhf-linux we can in theory rely on the overdrives but we are already struggling on aarch64-linux, we I think we should also drop it for now. Focusing on x86_64-linux, i686-linux and aarch64-linux for this release seems more pragmatic. > - ‘guix system init’ will print progress bars instead of dots > again (patch available): <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58375>. Just merged the fix that you reviewed :) > • Release issue <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53214> still blocked > by 8 open bugs that we should review! I'll take care of #53194 and #53541. I just closed #52943. It means that we will have to take care of: 57068 important, Ludovic Courtès Resizing mcron job in vm-image.tmpl interferes with settings 53594 important, Guu, Jin-Cheng no matching pattern #<package polkit.. 52891 normal,pat Konrad Hinsen [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Run guix.sh script in /etc/profile.d last. 49508 important, Leo Famulari Implement --allow-insecure-transport for `guix pull` Thanks, Mathieu