Am Freitag, dem 10.03.2023 um 22:44 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin: > > > Thanks for pointing that. From my understanding, it does not > > > change what Cayetanos is raising: emacs-next-tree-sitter is built > > > using '--with-pgtk'. In fact, the package emacs-next-tree-sitter > > > is built using the master branch (Emacs 30 unbranched yet) with > > > tree-sitter *and* pgtk support. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > simon > > > > As for the NEWS-29 file: > > > > "Running this configuration on X is known to have problems, such as > > undesirable frame positioning and various issues with keyboard > > input of sequences such as 'C-;' and 'C-S-u'." > > > > C. > > I haven't used X for a while, but if it's still the case for 30 > version, I guess we can inherit pgtk from tree-sitter. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point of C-S-u with pure GTK to use GNOME's ibus widget? Granted, we have other problems with ibus currently, but it's still a part that makes the pgtk branch feel gnomier.
As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here. We could try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have their cup of tea, but maintaining one's own Emacs on the user/channel level ought not to be too difficult either. Cheers