> I feel like the advantages of a email-based workflow nowadays is more on > the maintainer side of things (as managing large projects is easier
another thing worth pointing out here is that the harder it is to test a submitted patchset locally, the fewer non-committer reviews will happen. and if all the review work rests on the shoulders of the committers, then there'll be long response times on submissions, or straight out forgotten/ignored submissions (khm). especially if it's about some hw or some sw that none of the committers care about, or could test locally (e.g. Trezor support: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65037 that doesn't even build in master). -- • attila lendvai • PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 -- “A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant.” — Alan Perlis
