Hi Chris,I agree that Guix should step in to maintain the level of service that QA currently offers, by paying for hosting and sharing responsibility for system administration.
Whether the software's maintained or improved is something over which we've historically had very poor control. Things go awry when we pretend otherwise.
Christopher Baines 写道：
it's not the most cost effective setup
Has this been explained in more detail before?
I also think that fundamentally I may think that processes and toolingto make changes is more important than others regard it to be.
The disproportionate amount of effort you've put in, mostly unaided, implies as much.
(Proportionally disproportional thanks for that, by the way.) Both
more comments to provide some context for the configuration.
and
making some high level architecture diagrams for QA and the bordeauxbuild farm
would be very much appreciated!
As for monitoring and responding to problems, that's a bit morecomplicated, but in most cases a herd restart of the relevant bit willtemporarily resolve the issue.
Chuffed that the Guix Data Service embodies the same debugging philosophy as the other Guix infrastructure.
Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
