Am Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 08:14:08PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou via 
Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.:
> > So I am wondering now if we could use the graft mechanism to reduce the
> > number of texlivetexmf substitutes in circulation. Is this at all
> > reasonable to envisage?
> The goal is to remove monolithic texlive completely. See 
> <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/1197>

Which means that you can (and should) go ahead now, Konrad, and move to
the texlive installation with many separate packages; the only thing
missing for the removal of monolithic texlive is me doing the actual
work and cross-checking the Guix documentation etc.; everything you need
is already in the distribution.

Actually *what* people need will vary, I have installed the following:

texlive-collection-latex
texlive-collection-latexrecommended
texlive-collection-xetex
(as the basis, xetex is very optional)

texlive-babel
texlive-babel-english
texlive-babel-french
texlive-babel-german

texlive-biber
texlive-biblatex
texlive-biblatex-software
(this depends on your bibliography software; the latter is useful for SWH
identifiers, which are probably a common requirement in this community!)

texlive-pdfjam
(for the executable with the same name)

plus a number of packages that accumulated over time to compile this or
that document.

Andreas


Reply via email to