Hi Noé, On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 at 00:56, Noé Lopez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Makes sense, although I thought that the last one was already the > responsibility of the sponsors. > > It seems to me though that this is not what happened in reality. This is > just a feeling and I have no data to backup this claim. > > I think the idea of a GCD team is good, you can count me in (after the > release is done 😅). But I’d like to keep its responsibilities as low as > possible, to avoid team members having increased influence on GCDs. > > Anyhow, here’s my ideas for improvement of the process: > > - Reinforce the role of sponsors as timekeepers and consensus > facilitators, to ensure that discussions are always moving towards > consensus. > > - Provide mail templates to clarify the roles of everyone and what is > expected at each step. For example to clarify that the submission > period is not for discussion. I think we are on the same wavelength [1] about upgrading GCD 001. To do so, I propose to first draft a GCD for amending accepted GCDs. WDYT? Cheers, simon 1: Re: Updating processes that remain stuck to Debbugs Simon Tournier <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:17:01 +0100 id:[email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2025-12 https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
