Very interesting. > Committing LLM-generated code is clearly not well received by > everyone, so I won't make any Pull Requests with LLM-generated code.
yes. Free software is more about understanding than other communities. We all need to learn what and *why* an LLM can and cannot do, instead of anthropomorphizing these improved search engines without clear sources. I believe your Codex actually produced its commits from applying documemtation and not imitating commits. Not sure about Go details and if your agent should have used native-inputs in go-github-com-matttproud-golang-protobuf-extensions-v2 in https://codeberg.org/hugobuddel/guix-mirror/commit/04901453566e4af57305e87d9360955e5cdbc6bb and not inputs. Maybe it is right; maybe it is better at reading docs than me. The Guix commit 402eb6708521b23daaa7429a8ca18980cfac7327 I linked to as https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/hl4zmrxvw70ha4md1jhav3k14ydgn5iq-go-github-com-matttproud-golang-protobuf-extensions-v2-2.0.0.drv cannot have been inspiration for Codex; its go-github-com-matttproud-golang-protobuf-extensions-v2 code is the same and its derivation contains go-github-com-google-go-cmp as derivation input its old Guix commit got propagated from somewhere, not package input. Regards, Florian
