Hi Phong, On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 10:27, Nguyễn Gia Phong via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <[email protected]> wrote:
> TBH I've been struggling to keep up with the discussion of this GCD 7. > I don't feel like voting on or discussing something if I am unaware > of possible viewpoints to it. Perhaps it would help if the document > contains lists of alternatives and why they are not prefered. This is not how building a Guix Consensus Document works. It’s not expected from you to wait that all is on the table for you to choose your preference by casting a vote. Instead, it’s expected from you that you actively collaborate on constructing the GCD itself. Somehow, it’s not about trying to convince that this or that alternative is “better” but it’s about what I cannot live with in the current proposal. That’s said, I agree that the Codeberg web-interface makes very hard to follow the different discussions and then to maybe comment on this or that specific point. > I thought it would also help if each proposal tries to address > one particular matter (single-subject rule). Thanks for your comment and the other part I cut. :-) Well, my understanding about the GCD 007 is that it clarifies the current “teams” and makes Maintainers a specific team. That’s said, I agree the wording must be adjusted in order to make clearer the outcome. Cheers, simon
