Greg Hogan <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 4:00 AM Simon Tournier <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The Discussion period started on Sat, 28 Feb 2026 and ended on Wed, 29 April >> 2026. >> >> Now the Deliberation Period starts. Please review: >> >> GCD007: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships >> >> <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/11> >> >> And please reply, either >> >> . I support >> . I accept >> . I disapprove >> >> The deliberation period ends on Thu, 14 May. > > On Codeberg the most recent edit is 878d03975c9e2f256c650f3c0d86736a5ccd31d1. > > I disapprove. > > I don't feel the need to rehash the unanswered questions and concerns, > but our GCD process has proven unable to achieve consensus. Proposals > starting at a point of general agreement have passed with minor > changes, but for both 003 and 007 the authors were unwilling to modify > or trim the proposal in the direction of consensus. How can we provide > more feedback to authors earlier in the process both pre-submission > and pre-deliberation? > > Greg
Hello Greg, Could you please explain here why you disapprove of the current version, and what you think would be a good way forwards? GCD 001: “A deliberating member disapproving a proposal bears a responsibility for finding alternatives, proposing ideas or code, or explaining the rationale for the status quo.” Thanks, Noé
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
