Hello Thanos, thanks for your input!
Am Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 12:59:37PM +0300 schrieb Thanos Apollo: > One suggestion: the "Removal of building packages" section lists > reasons a package may become a removal candidate in prose. > An explicit enumeration would make it easier to reference in deprecation > PRs: I did not reply earlier since the discussion period was over; however I considered taking this suggestion into account for the final structure of the text in the manual. But I think it makes everything a bit too lengthy, and there will be too many levels of items. If you want to comment on the wording in the manual, the PR is here: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/8377 In any case, I would like to keep as close to the wording of the GCD as possible. Andreas
