Re: Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting”

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Nguyễn Gia Phong <c...@loang.net> skribis:

> On 2026-05-27 at 15:49+02:00, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Nguyễn Gia Phong skribis:
>> > In practice it doesn't matter which school of thought one is in
>> > for us to work together, but signing off this GCD as-is means
>> > I have to subscribe to the former filosofi as a mean to my end
>> > (the ban of LLM output in Guix) and I feel "manipulated".
>>
>> During deliberation, each one of us will say whether they support,
>> accept, or disapprove the implementation of what the “Detailed Design”
>> section proposes, and only that.
>
> Thanks for clearing that up!  Could GCD 1 be amended with that?

GCD 1 reads:

  - “I support”, meaning that one supports the proposal;
  - “I accept”, meaning that one consents to the implementation of the
    proposal;
  - “I disapprove”, meaning that one opposes the implementation of the
    proposal.  A team member sending this reply should have made constructive
    comments during the discussion period.

To me, “the proposal” is what’s under “Detailed Design”; the
“Motivation” section is not a proposal in any sense of the word.

Now, we could always prepare a GCD (!) to clarify this if people find it
ambiguous, but of course it’s going to take a couple of months to land.

Thanks,
Ludo’.