Hi Ludo, On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 at 17:30, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote:
> The version currently checked in at > <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/13> reads > “will not use nor encourage use of genAI to author code or packages, to > review code, […]”. > > So it’s not “any use”, it’s the specific uses that are listed, and for > project-related activities. This doesn’t answer to my concern. Is it “any use” to author code or packages, to review code, […]? I’m sorry but I cannot do better than providing a real-world example [1] with a concrete use-case where the meaning of “use” remains ambiguous with the current wording. Do you consider that this use of ChatGPT <https://chatgpt.com/share/69844b1c-0a10-8011-8308-333ed22e3ed2> that leads to this author code or package <https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/1623>, would it be a breach of Rule #1? Cheers, simon PS: And you cannot escape by applying Rule #2 about some “not legally significant” code since I’m not contributor but I feel part of “the project” as someone with write access to one Guix repository. 1: Re: Can a project accept LLMs' code contribution and remain free software? Hugo Buddelmeijer via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:52:46 +0100 id:[email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-02 https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
