Hi,

Rutherther <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Noé,
>
> first of all thank you for your initiative!
>
> Noé Lopez <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> As the summer vacations are in full swing, I would like to take some
>> (late) advance on the process for the next release team.
>>
>> The release would be worked on from mid-September to the end of
>> November (see annex).
>>
>> Given this timing, who would like to volunteer?
>>
>> Last time we talked about this, I noted:
>>             * Release Manager
>>                 * Jelle Licht?
>>                 * Efraim (returning)
>>             * Members
>>                 * Rutherther (depending on timing)
>
> I will try to make as much time as possible to help as part of the
> release team. I will however not have as much time as I did last year I
> am afraid.

I'd love to try my hand at this as previously mentioned.

>> Have a nice day,
>> Noé
>>
>> Annex: release timing
>>
>> In the original GCD, it was planned that a release was done for every
>> June, this is of course not realistic given the timing of the previous
>> release. However we should not wait until next year either.
>>
>> Members of the previous release team have improved the process[1] for
>> the next team, so that it may take less time and that it is easier.
>>
>> With this in mind, I think it is fair to aim for a ~10 week release
>> cycle. As for the exact timing, it is best if it is completely done by
>> the december holidays.
>
> This sounds ambitious on one hand, but I think if one starts early with
> stuff like trying if make dist works (it did not last release and we had
> to do some late changes to fix stuff like that) and so on, it should be
> fine. And monitoring of something did not get broken.

I do have about 8 days of (off-line) planned absences during week 2/3 in
the projected timeline, so ideally we can get the ball rolling before
that.

> I have previously made some issues I envisioned to do until the next
> release, they are mostly assigned to me on codeberg. Those would improve
> the releases, but they are not strictly necessary.
>
>>
>> [1] https://codeberg.org/guix/release-planning/pulls
>
> And am still pending to do more improvements, I will try to make time
> very soon.

KR,
- Jelle

Reply via email to