On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I went to go do it, but decided that (for me) I preferred the 'human
> looking' paragraph (rather than lines).

I don't think I understand this.  The nag mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] last
night contains a line

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the 
request please visit http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

A single line.  I ask to make it

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/nagged.html, and/or contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

which is a paragraph, isn't it?

> Also, perhaps oddly, mine doesn't appear to be wrapped when I read
> it in e-mail. Maybe some mail servers/clients don't wrap these days,
> even though Gump sends plain text (not HTML/RTF or anything fancy).

Mail servers shouldn't ever wrap anything.  And no client I use would
dare to wrap lines for me.  8-)

Not quite true, I had the "pleasure" to use Lotus Notes in a former
job and it was configured to do just that, it made Usenet style
quoting completely useless.

No line longer than 72 columns (if possible) is kind of "standard".

Cheers

        Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to