On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 17:09, David Scheidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Evyn MacDude <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Your giving up butt-loads of mechanical advantage, just for the geewhiz
> of
> > a
> > flying appliance. Or a small engine and transmission for much larger
> > thrusters. It's a physics and engineering question.
> >
> >
> anti-gravity is cheap and reliable.  You gain the ability to till soil
> that's too water logged to drive over.  You can farm on ground that won't
> support high ground pressure.  I know people here, in northern Indiana, who
> own land that can't be machine cultivated.  It consists of a couple feet of
> decent soil, and then a bottomless (well, only a few thousand feet to
> bedrock, so not bottomless) muckpit.


Gee you just described nearly any place there is permafrost.....


> There are lots
> of places like that on Earth; i'd imagine there are whole planets like
> that.
>

Whole Planets?


> Don't forget that one reason that tractors are huge is because the limiting
> factor on how hard they can pull is the amount of friction they can
> generate.


And overcome. How do you down shift?


> That's a function of normal force, i.e. their weight.  if your
> limit on force you can apply is your engine, you can be a whole lot
> smaller.
>

I take you have never worked on a farm then?

All I am saying for gross earth moving Grav is inefficient. But for modern
industrial agriculture work Grav has a whole bunch of advantages, just not
plowing.



-- 
Evyn
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l

Reply via email to