This definitely is a complex issue, and truthfully, I don't see our current
screen reader technologists going away any time soon. Even if the general
software manufacturers like Microsoft put in something, there may still be
fine-tuning things in terms of scripts, etc. for specific things which would
still have to be done. I don't think this will ever be 20/20 in what we
actually hear as we work with computers.

Dianne

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Jacobson [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 9:05 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [GW-Booksense] Re: GW Micro Responds to the Future of Screen
Readers Discussion Panel Questions

Ray,

I think the verdict is still out on how well the Apple model will work.  We
need to see how committed they are in three or four years to really judge.
I would 
also note that I Tunes if far more accessible under Windows than Microsoft
Word is on the MAC.  This comparison is not completely fair, but I think it
still 
makes a valid point.  Would Microsoft have worked hard to make I tunes
accessible if they had a full-featured screen reader, especially when they
were 
pushing Zune?  What priority is apple giving to Microsoft Word on the MAC?  

Apple exercises a good deal more control over apps that run on their
platform than does Microsoft.  This gives them the ability to put more of
the work of 
accessibility on the application developer which means that VoiceOver does
not have to do everything that Windows screen readers have to do.  Apple 
has full control of the hardware running their operating system unlike
Microsoft.  This also simplifies things for them.  This control is helpful
for them but it is 
probably partly why they don't have the market share that Windows has.    

As Microsoft tightens up their operating system, it could be that it will
become easier for them to include a screen reader with Windows.  However, if
it is any 
good, it is hard for me to see how companies such as GW Micro would have a
large enough market left to sell enough to do what they do.  Probably people

using a PC at home would benefit greatly, but would those of us who use less
common software on the job be left out in the cold.  I don't know the exact 
answer, but if I had my preference, I'd like to see some competition remain
with screen readers and for us to find ways of increasing funding available
to 
blind people to purchase them.  This is a complex issue to say the least.

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:54:35 +0000, Ray Campbell wrote:

>Hello All:

>I agree, for the most part, with GW Micro's response to the screen reader
questions.  There are a couple of areas I'd like to address.

>As a technical support professional, one of the areas that GW Micro still
needs to work on is remote support.  Freedom Scientific has done a huge
service 
to those of us providing technical support with the introduction of JAWS
Tandem.  Nine times out of 10, when I talk with someone using JAWS version
10 
or higher that is having a problem, they will ask me to take over their
computer with JAWS Tandem and fix the problem.  Tandem is built into JAWS
and 
there is no additional charge.  While Serotek has also built a very good
solution in Remote Incident Management (RIM), it costs $1,200 a year, very
hard to 
justify for not-for-profit agencies like the one I work for.

>But, remote tools aren't just used by technical support professionals.
Tools such as Go to My PC are used by business people to access data on
their 
office PCs all the time.  I would like to see GW Micro continue working to
make existing remote tools such as Remote Assistance, Go to My PC and Log Me

In Pro fully accessible, regardless which end of the connection you are on.

>Window-eyes, from our perspective, provides the best support for so-called
green screen applications.  These are main frame applications which people 
sometimes have to use on the job.  Our agency contracts with the state of
Illinois for one program where such an application is used.  Using
Window-Eyes 
and a 80-cell Braille Display, a person who is totally blind can access this
application, albeit the support could always be better.  JAWS won't even
work 
with this application, and we haven't tested System Access or NVDA with it.
If we were able to do some scripting, I believe we could make the support
with 
Window-Eyes even better.

>Finally, I'd like to address the issue of built-in screen readers.  I
believe that as the Mac becomes the computer of choice for people who are
blind, 
Microsoft is going to need to incorporate a screen reader into Windows.  I
use PCs exclusively at work and at home, and I've been a loyal Window-Eyes 
user for about 14 years.  However, I am increasingly becoming impressed with
what the Mac and other Apple products using VoiceOver can do right out of 
the box.  While GW Micro deserves kudos for offering the Lease to Own plan,
a plan not duplicated by other screen reader vendors, it's not the same as 
having accessibility right out of the box.

>Thanks for reading.


>Ray Campbell, Adaptive Technology Help Desk Technician
>The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired
>1850 W. Roosevelt Road
>Chicago, IL  60608
>312.997.3651 (Voice/Relay) or 888.825.0080 (Voice/Relay)
>[email protected]
>www.chicagolighthouse.org



>If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list andyour message is
related to GW 
Micro or the BookSense, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

>To manage your subscription to gw-booksense, visit:

>http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv





If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only.  If your reply would benefit others on the list andyour message is
related to GW Micro or the BookSense, then please consider sending your
message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

To manage your subscription to gw-booksense, visit:

http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv

If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only.  
If your reply would benefit others on the list andyour message is related to GW 
Micro or the BookSense, then please consider sending your message to 
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.

To manage your subscription to gw-booksense, visit:

http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv

Reply via email to