The point is that you would be able to choose what was formatted and
what wasn't formatted i.e. in plain text in the same document.
At 19:54 26/11/2014, you wrote:
You already have that option. If you paste the selected text in to a text
editor you will just paste the text. If you paste it in to a program that
supports the formatting you will get the formatting. What would be the
advantage of pasting the text in to a program that supports the formatting
without the formatting?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Bushman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:02 AM
To: 'Chris Skarstad'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Selecting text on a web page
No matter how we do it we need an option to get text only.
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Skarstad [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Selecting text on a web page
I have to say I agree. I think we should be given the choice to do
either method, as I can actually see times where the f8-f8 method could
be useful, just not all the time ya know? let me please encourage the ai
squared guys to add the standard text selection method back in. It's
gotten to the point now where i have to switch to another screenreader
just so I can select a few bits of text, and then switch back to WE 9.
The older way really was faster for me. After all, regular sighted
users don't select text in that manner.
On 11/26/2014 8:42 AM, Whizza wrote:
> Hi,
> Trying to come to grips with the new method of selecting text on a web
> page and wish I understood why this very slow and cumbersome method of
> text selection has been included. What was wrong with the shift and
> arrow keys? It is a standard Windows command after all and takes a
> fraction of the time this F8 method takes.
> I saw a message where someone said the word box in an edit box had
> been missed out to make the process of navigation faster, so why
> didn't the same logic apply in the text selection method.
>
> Cheers,
> Sandra. If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the
> original sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list
> and your message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending
> your message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
>
> GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You
> can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
>
>
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender
only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is
related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to
[email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can
manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original
sender only. If your reply would benefit others on the list and your
message is related to GW Micro, then please consider sending your
message to [email protected] so the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You
can manage your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
If you reply to this message it will be delivered to the original sender only.
If your reply would benefit others on the list and your message is related to
GW Micro, then please consider sending your message to [email protected] so
the entire list will receive it.
GW-Info messages are archived at http://www.gwmicro.com/gwinfo. You can manage
your list subscription at http://www.gwmicro.com/listserv.
