The big problem with it though is that it puts the wrong stress on the rong 
syllable.  For instance, we stress the 12 in 2012 and not the 20.  We stresses 
the 20, the first syllable instead of the second like normal English speakers 
do.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Orange [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: To all Natively English speaking users - I need some feedback:

Hi David,

I think our American English version of Eloquence may be different than the one 
you're using?  Because as Mike and others have pointed out, it is already 
speaking a 4-digit year in the way you are proposing (the first two digits as a 
number, followed by the last two digits as a number).

I think you are likely to find this varies from synthesizer to synthesizer, and 
within each one probably varies from one language version to the next.

Good luck with this!

Chip
 


________________________________

        From: David [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 AM
        To: WE English mailing list
        Cc: [email protected]
        Subject: To all Natively English speaking users - I need some
feedback:
        
        
        In my local Non-English language, we often use to divide the four digit 
year number, into two groups of two-digits. That is, the year 1995, would be 
pronounced as 19 95.
         
        As I am working on the Extended Dictionary app, that has been anounced 
on the list earlier, I wanted to know, what is the official way of pronouncing 
year numbers in English. Or, at least, what is the general wish of the 
community. As you all will have noticed, Eloquence by standard wants to read 
out the year as a full four-digit number. At least to me, I find that rather 
wearisome, as the number 1981 would produce more verbage, than would 19 81. 
         
        The app is doing quite a bit of Date handling, and there is a chance 
here to modify the way of reading year numbers. And, just to calm you all down, 
the stuff can easily be modified by the end-user. Yet, I want to know, if it 
would be the wish of the community, to have some kind of modified 
pronounciation of the years, shipping with the app.
         
        All feedback will be appreciated. Thanks alot,
         
        David
        (The Author of the Extended Dictionary app)
         
        PS: The Extended Dictionary appp is currently in its Beta-testing 
process. Hopefully, it will be made available to the community later this 
summer. Still, this question goes to the whole community, since it has been 
considered of vital importance. All the modification the app will be performing 
to any speech output, can be fully controled by the user. Even if the app ships 
with a set of modifications, the user is free to do what he wants with the 
shipped entries.




Reply via email to