Thank you, Yeti. I have sent some sample data to your e-mail.
-Erika
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:44 AM David Nečas (Yeti) <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:24:47PM +0000, Erika Callagon wrote:
> The values that I read (for instance, in Statistical
> Quantities) sometimes will only display two significant digits. I'm trying
> to measure average height differences from VSI data (in the nm-range), but
> the displayed value for Average Height in Statistical Quantities would be
> for example "1.2 µm".
This really should not happen. Could you maybe send me some example
data where you encounter this (possibly with a hint what to try reading
if it is not obvious)?
> It would be useful if there is a way to set the precision in the
> reported measures. Is there a current work-around to this?
It is not possible to set the precision manually. And I am quite
resistant against such feature request, always trying to make things
work automatically better instead – because that actually improves the
software and makes it more pleasant to use, as opposed to enabling
workarounds for things that work poorly. So I am trying to understand
what goes wrong for your data.
Regards,
Yeti
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Gwyddion-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwyddion-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Gwyddion-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwyddion-users
