On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:12:26PM +0000, Erika Callagon wrote: > Thank you, Yeti. I have sent some sample data to your e-mail.
I revised the statistical quantities module and the unit and precision format choices should be improved, in particular they are chosen according to the selected part instead of the entire image and dispersion-like quantities were decoupled from total-range-like quantities (and a few other things). The changes will appear in tomorrow's development snapshot. That said, I do not see the tool doing anything that wrong in your screenshots. When the Z range is 20+ µm then 10 nm precision of the minimum, maximum and mean values seems about right. The precision of dispersion-like quantities was affected by the global value offset, and that should be fixed now. Generally, if you data have micron range (and you even want nm-like differences) but are globally offset by 3.6 cm some things can be expected to be displayed in an odd and possibly unhelpful manner. Similarly, extracting smaller regions of interest from a 4.3k×2.6k image for detailed analysis is always going to be beneficial for data processing speed, if nothing else. Regards, Yeti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gwyddion-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwyddion-users
