I'll let someone more qualified give you a better answer.
But, yes I can't see any reason why it wouldn't work (The same as if it
was on a read only filesystem?)
I find embedded mode has better performance, but it is more profound in
lots of smaller queries. If it is larger less frequent queries there
isn't as much difference.
You might have to test your specific case if you are trying to squeeze
every bit of performance possible.
Not sure if the cache might be better with the server though. Otherwise
each process will have it's own cache.
On 28/02/2015 8:49 PM, Johann Petrak wrote:
Is it possible, safe and reasonable to add
;FILE_LOCK=NO;ACCESS_MODE_DATA=r
to the URL from two processes which use the same database in embedded mode?
If yes, can I expect better performance from doing it that way than from
using a local server?
thanks
johann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "H2 Database" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to h2-database@googlegroups.com
<mailto:h2-database@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2
Database" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to h2-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to h2-database@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
