Michael Bishop wrote: >> If the argument is that we shouldn't change things that the users are >> most familiar with, the argument could be extended to say that all >> links, no matter where, must be underlined, and should keep the default >> blue/red/purple color scheme that we're all familiar with. While I >> realize this is taking the argument to an extreme, I think it >> illustrates the point that people adjust to changes from the familiar >> constantly and, usually, without any conscious effort. It always bothers >> me when arguments are made that cast our theoretical users as not only >> "less savvy" but darn near idiotic. >> > > It's not as far fetched an example as one might think. I've heard the > word "accessibility" thrown around quite a bit regarding the buttons, > and find it humorous, as it's a selective use of the term. Links in > admin are a perfect example. Ever try to configure a plugin that > requires an external link? It's almost impossible to discern it, and > I have a pretty decent monitor and good eye sight, not to mention I'm > not color blind. There is a logical foundation for why default links > are styled a certain way. However, a decision was made for aesthetic > reasons to ignore these rules. To me, that sets a precedent, and all > elements are fair game for change, assuming there is some valid > argument for making them.
FWIW, I'm all in favor of underlining links in admin 'content', since I have the exact same problem. -Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
