Michael Shalayeff <mickey <at> lucifier.net> writes: >> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:07:40AM +0000, Peter Kun wrote: >> Michael Shalayeff <mickey <at> lucifier.net> writes: >> >> > but yet do not rush rebuilding anything right now since there are >> > more changes coming after which we shall have a snapshot you can >> > just unroll and save the hastle (unless you really want to do >> > it yourself ;). also by then ld(1) will be linked into the built. >> > cu >> >> Hi. How is the progress on this task? Is there is any way to build >> working system?
> re > user binaries all build on i386 and amd64. > theoretically arm shall work also but i have no system > to run that is supported (: > in fact there is sort of a snapshot one can unroll on top > of openbsd 4.4 just do not forget to setup /emul/openbsd/libexec/ld.so > and reboot new kernel before unrolling the userland (: > ftp://ftp.aeriebsd.org/pub/AerieBSD/snapshots/i386/ > then make build shall be done and reboot; > mkdir /emul/openbsd/usr/lib > mv /usr/lib/*.so.* /emul/openbsd/usr/lib > kernel is still built with gcc... > pcc used to have some issues but i mean to retest > now with many bugs fixed in pcc. > the only binary built by hands from binutils is gas(1)... > i've been concentrating on as(1) but damn i386 opcodes > are driving me nuts (: all those 800 of them (: > nroff(1) has issues but those shall be realtively easy to debug. > cu > -- > paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained) Thanks for details, much appreciated :-)
