Right, OK sounds like a plan. Lets schedule this for release 7.4.
thanks, aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: Philip Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:32 am Subject: Re: [HACKYSTAT-DEV-L] Maven module packaging proposal To: [email protected] > --On Monday, February 20, 2006 11:25 PM -1000 Aaron Kagawa > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here's an idea, why don't I just add the code to > hackySensor_JUnit? That > > might complicate things, but that idea seems like the "right" > idea. Since > > there could be an Ant, Command Line, and Maven sensors. Does > > hackySensor_JUnit stand for all sensors that deal with JUnit or > does that > > mean only Ant based Junit sensors? > > This seems "right" to me, too. And come to think of it, if you do > it this > way, it might be quite easy to refactor and reduce the total amount > of code > (it looked to me like the Maven junit sensor cut-and-pasted a lot > of code > from the standard JUnit sensor). > > Cheers, > Philip >
