Good idea, thanks. On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Praveen Sripati <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > Although BSP had been there for some time, many are more familiar with the > MR framework due to the media attention/articles/ecosystem/$$ etc. I think > the trend is to fit everything into MR. The earlier mentioned paper > compares MR and BSP, but it's neck deep and something (explanation and > references) at a high level can be added to Hama wiki FAQ along these lines. > > 1. What is BSP? > > 2. What types of problems can and can't be solved with BSP? > > 3. Comparing BSP with MR? When to go for BSP and when for MR? > > 4. What are the performance metrics comparing BSP and MR for the same > problem? > > 5. Why go for Hama when there are other implementations of BSP? > > Also, couple of articles (in IBM DW and others) would really spread the > word about Hama. Since, I am new to Hama/BSP I can help to review the > articles from a fresh set of eyes. > > Regards, > Praveen > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Tudor Serban <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks, interesting read. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Praveen Sripati <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 5:02 PM >> Subject: BSP vs MR >> >> Hi, >> >> Came across this paper comparing BSP and MR. >> >> http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.2081 >> >> Praveen >>
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
