A "-". Generally, if the helper directly outputs to the buffer (like
open and puts, as well as form_for and some other built-in helpers), the
results shouldn't be output. We're nice enough to return nil so it won't
be rendered anyway, but that won't always be the case.
- Nathan
wolfmanjm wrote:
> Another question...
>
> Should a helper that uses open and puts be called with a - or = ?
>
> ie
> - mycoolhelper
> or
> = mycoolhelper
>
> as both work, I just wanted to not be deprecated in the future :)
>
>
> On Jul 8, 12:19 pm, wolfmanjm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I wasn't stuck I just used puts "<hr/>" but it seemed a little
>> inconsistent :)
>>
>> Maybe I should rephrase this as a feature request ;)
>>
>> On Jul 8, 12:14 pm, "s.ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This patch should solve your problem. Just use:
>>>
>>> open 'hr /'
>>>
>>> instead of the symbol. Note: this does not interpolate the
>>> attributes ... just thought it might get you going if you were stuck.
>>>
>>> 258c258,259
>>> <
>>> ---
>>>
>>> > name = name.to_s
>>> 268c269
>>> < puts "</#{name}>"
>>> ---
>>> > puts "</#{name}>" unless name[-1].chr == '/'
>>>
>>> On Jul 8, 2007, at 12:05 PM, wolfmanjm wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is cleaner.
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering shouldn't...
>>>>
>>>> open :hr
>>>>
>>>> generate
>>>>
>>>> <hr/>
>>>>
>>>> rather than
>>>>
>>>> <hr>
>>>> </hr>
>>>>
>>>> or do I just do
>>>>
>>>> puts "<hr/>
>>>>
>>>> ??
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 8, 9:31 am, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The open stuff is pretty killer. Makes your helpers MUCH MUCH
>>>>> cleaner.
>>>>>
>>>>> I use them all the time now.
>>>>>
>>>>> -hampton.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/8/07, wolfmanjm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks thats better ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 7, 8:20 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Huh... it appears that the link was broken. Try this one instead:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/docs/rdoc/classes/Haml/Helpers/
>>>>>> ActionVi....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that that class doesn't have what you're looking for. I was
>>>>>>> referring to the "open" helper, which is in Haml::Helpers
>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/docs/rdoc/classes/Haml/
>>>>>> Helpers.html#M00...).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that it /wasn't/ documented there until I uploaded the most
>>>>>>> recent
>>>>>>> documentation just now, so if you looked there earlier and
>>>>>>> didn't find
>>>>>>> anything that's why.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Nathan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wolfmanjm wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the new 1.7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This new feature intrigued me...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Haml helpers to allow you to write elegantly formatted HTML in
>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>> helpers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I looked for docs on how to use it, but this link returned
>>>>>>>> an error
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://haml.hamptoncatlin.com/docs/Haml/Helpers/
>>>>>>>> ActionViewExtensions..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are there any examples of how to use this feature? It sounds
>>>>>>>> just like
>>>>>>>> what I need.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>
>
> >
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
