* s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-10 16:00:09 -0800]: > Only one concern. I have a bunch of projects that reference haml using > svn:externals. Most Rails plugins are on svn so a wholesale changeover > to git would be (for me) premature. Is there some kind of bridge that > will help with this?
I would suggest that the stable versions of haml be pushed out to svn without the commit history. That way people can still track the library using svn:externals. Anyone wanting to develop on the library should really use the primary version control system (in this case, git). Just a thought, Tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
