Actually I was hoping for make_resourceful to get into github, not that i'm starting a project and expected it to be there. But it seems neither Nathan, nor Hampton have a github make_resourceful .. which would be my choice of an "official" branch.
today? tomorrow? *wink* *wink* On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Geffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 11, 10:48 pm, "Nathan Weizenbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since it looks like we're moving to GitHub, a Subversion mirror will be > > available. > > Yay :D > > > > There are too many particular attractions of Git to enumerate in an email. > > The thing is, it has a superset of Subversion's features, including stuff > > that's useful in day-to-day single-developer projects, like > > nearly-instantaneous commits and tools like git bisect. > > I've been reading a lot about it, now if I just had some time for a > personal project where I could try it out ;) > > > - Nathan > > > > > > On Feb 11, 2008 3:51 AM, Geffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I track HAML almost exclusively with piston so please keep an SVN > > > mirror up to date as well. > > > > > I've tried git a couple times now and I still fail to see the > > > particular attraction, but its likely that it just doesn't work like I > > > do :-P > > > > > Cheers, > > > Geoff > > > > > On Feb 11, 10:15 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't think it'll be that much of a problem... other than the > > > > occasional svn:externals reference, most recent installations should be > > > > via Gem anyway, which won't be affected. If it does become an issue, > > > > I'll just suck it up and add a post-push hook to commit stable changes > > > > to Subversion as well. > > > > > > Since m_r is typically installed via script/plugin, I don't think we'll > > > > be switching it over. > > > > > > - Nathan > > > > > > Tom Stuart wrote: > > > > > On 11 Feb 2008, at 00:43, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > > > > > > >> I'm not sure what to do if > > > > >> you're tracking stable or a particular tag, though... I don't really > > > > >> want to continually sync with the subversion repo. At that point, it > > > > >> might just be a good idea to use the gems. > > > > > > > This is a pretty grim scenario; I can already see many hours of > > > git-vs- > > > > > svn-vs-gems hassle unfolding in my future. Rails developers > > > > > overwhelmingly use svn. Please don't switch make_resourceful over > too. > > > > > > > I agree that distributed version control is the future, and starting > > > > > new projects on git is fun for everyone, but taking existing ones > > > > > completely out of svn and into git only generates headaches for > > > > > existing users. > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > -Tom > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
