This is very interesting, I'll have to take a look at this. Nice work Mislav.
On Mar 5, 1:13 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > When Haml was originally created, Hampton decided to make it even easier > to create divs than it was to create other sorts of tags by making divs > the default. > > Mislav Marohnić had an interesting idea for extending this. In some > cases, divs are invalid - within a p tag, for example, or an ol. What if > instead of producing a div, an implicit tag would create whatever makes > sense? A span, an li, maybe a tr or td. > > There are a few potential issues with this. It makes Haml's output more > dependent on the document context than it usually is, and might break a > few templates. On the other hand, you should be thinking about the > context in which you use divs anyway, and any templates it breaks are > invalid anyway. > > So I wanted to get the community's opinion on this. Is this something > you'd like? Something you'd dislike? Or does it not really matter to you? > > If you want to try it out, grab Mislav's Haml fork at > git://github.com/mislav/haml.git. > > - Nathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
