A DIV can't be inside a UL, but it can be inside an LI. Seems to me this (and the other examples given) show that people don't know what to expect, indicating these smart implicit tags aren't perhaps advisable. You'd have to think about your future developers who will read your haml code too.
Lawrence > I would think... > > %ul > .a yo > .b sup > > Would translate to... > > <ul> > <li class='a'> > yo > <span class='b'> > sup > </span> > </li> > </ul> > > Since I don't think a DIV can just be inside a UL. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
