Okay - I'd be interested in hearing the opinion of someone else who uses jEdit. For now, I'll just link it as "Alternate".
Rha7dotCom wrote: > Not exactly a superset, I made it from scratch, to later find out it > had already been done. Tried the existing one, but didn't like all of > it, so I took the parts I liked, and added them to the one I had made, > and the posted file is the result. > > The one I made recognizes HTML and CSS keywords for property names, > but then again, I had never made a jEdit mode before, so I just > followed the docs and made it work. > > I think it works better, but somebody who really knows should check it > before, I may have made a few mistakes and I don't know if erros in a > mode file could have any negative impact in jEdit. > > Thanks for asking, I wish I could be of more help. > > BTW, thanks for your awesome work. > > Gabriel Medina. > > > > On Oct 4, 12:09 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does this provide a superset of the functionality of the original Sass >> mode? If so, I should link to it instead of the current mode. >> >> Rha7dotCom wrote: >> >>> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/haml/web/sass-alternate.xml >>> >>> Hi, I posted to the files section an alternate SASS mode for jEdit, >>> use as normal sass.xml file, or just update the file referenced as >>> sass.xml and change it to sass-alternate.xml in your ~/.jedit/modes/ >>> catalog file. >>> >>> Hope it's useful. >>> >>> Gabriel Medina. >>> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
