On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 22:57, s.ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > The point here was that you can install ruby and haml, then do: > > sass foo.sass > foo.css > > You can manually compile just as with lesscss. How could this be written > better or is it relevant? >
This would be better written as "includes command-line tools to convert Haml->HTML or Sass->CSS and vice-versa". It should also be noted that HTML->Haml tool can handle ERB --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
