On 6-1-2011 10:51, Brett Delle Grazie wrote: > The best solution would depend upon your requirements but an optimal one > (with no requirement for a server to be dormant until failure - i.e. > pure HA) is (for 2 node load balancer): > 2 IPs registered in DNS-RR > 2 virtual IPs which are those listed in DNS-RR. > HAproxy running on both nodes > Cluster controlling software (RHCS or Corosync + Pacemaker or Heartbeat > + Pacemaker) managing virtual IPs and HA proxy on both nodes. According > to current advice from linux-cluster and pacemaker mailing lists - stay > away from Heartbeat 2.x - I know this is supplied by most distributions > but it is buggy and doesn't handle certain corner cases well. > > Hope this helps.
And if you want to have your pacemaker+corosync cluster up within the next hour, follow this howto on my site ;) http://blog.hongens.nl/guides/setting-up-a-pacemaker-cluster-on-centosrhel/ -- With kind regards, Angelo Höngens systems administrator MCSE on Windows 2003 MCSE on Windows 2000 MS Small Business Specialist ------------------------------------------ NetMatch tourism internet software solutions Ringbaan Oost 2b 5013 CA Tilburg +31 (0)13 5811088 +31 (0)13 5821239 a.hong...@netmatch.nl www.netmatch.nl ------------------------------------------