On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:03:15PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Finn, > > Yes, thanks for the update, I noticed this too and fixed it during > tests. I'm OK with this method. I have just replaced the macros with > inline functions (which I verified produced the same code) because > the result is more readable. And I removed the typedef, as I consider > that typedefs for scalars just add obfuscation, but I know it's a > matter of taste. > > I'm about to merge the attached patch, unless you raise your hand in > a very short time ;-)
Thanks, it's much nicer like this! The typedef was only there to support the two different macro versions since they needed different types in the delimiter. - Finn Arne
