On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Finn Arne Gangstad wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:03:15PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Finn, > > > > Yes, thanks for the update, I noticed this too and fixed it during > > tests. I'm OK with this method. I have just replaced the macros with > > inline functions (which I verified produced the same code) because > > the result is more readable. And I removed the typedef, as I consider > > that typedefs for scalars just add obfuscation, but I know it's a > > matter of taste. > > > > I'm about to merge the attached patch, unless you raise your hand in > > a very short time ;-) > > Thanks, it's much nicer like this! The typedef was only there to > support the two different macro versions since they needed different > types in the delimiter.
Perfect. I've merged it. Thanks for the quick feedback, Willy
