Hi Nick, On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:33:13PM +0100, Nick Chalk wrote: > Hello Brane. > > On 21 September 2011 21:30, Brane F. Gra??nar <brane.grac...@najdi.si> wrote: > > Try replacing this line with: > > > > server r41 192.168.68.41:80 weight 1 check inter 2000 rise 2 fall 3 > > minconn 0 maxconn 0 > > Yes, explicitly specifying the real server port works fine - but > that's exercising a different code path. > > Originally, the virtual service was defined with a range of ports, so > the real server had to be specified without a port. I simplified the > configuration for the purposes of testing.
Wow, you've hit an amazing bug. I seem to remember we touched that area reacently when a server port was ignored. I'll have a look at this, because it's very likely that we fixed it wrong. Cheers, Willy
